Lillian Leatham Aug 1 2023 at 10:55AM on page 86 This should be directional signs on nearby roads, not roads within the park. (for example, a road along the highway) replies
Lillian Leatham Aug 1 2023 at 10:54AM on page 85 Add South Trout Brook Focus Area. Mention that the bridge over Trout Brook is being relocated to a more sustainable location. replies
Lillian Leatham Aug 1 2023 at 10:42AM on page 109 "The existing picnic shelters currently have electricity.” replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 31 2023 at 4:19PM on page 109 or insead of iimpacts in the page heading, use 'conflicts' replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 31 2023 at 4:19PM on page 109 heading color? Consider making this its own topic with a higher level heading since it is one of the MC requirements replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 31 2023 at 4:15PM on page 104 Add," All new or substantially altered improvements will utilize the U.S. Access Board’s guidelines for Outdoor Developed areas as minimum standards for accessibility. " replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 31 2023 at 3:56PM on page 107 Only include interpretation implementation content here and move stewardship to the plan chapter. I will provide additional stewardship content. replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 31 2023 at 3:54PM on page 94 I will provide additional cultural landscape stewardship content. I think it should be here instead of the implementation section. replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 31 2023 at 3:50PM on page 104 Consider deleting this section or simplifying the content: "The Miesville Ravine Park Reserve Natural Resources Management Plan (NRMP) guides natural resource stewardship in Park. The NRMP was developed in tandem with this plan." replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 31 2023 at 3:43PM on page 93 Pursue opportunities for cooperative management of the park’s natural systems with tribal partners. replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 31 2023 at 3:38PM on page 104 Delete this paragraph - I think it is too strong and doesn't need to be highlighted. It is reccomended in the NR section. replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 31 2023 at 3:34PM on page 88 Be sure to elaborate on role of grazing to set up the reccomendtion to consider bison, which should occur in this chapter. replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 31 2023 at 3:34PM on page 88 As mentioned in the existing conditions chapter, integrate issues and opportunites into the NR discussion there. replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 31 2023 at 3:32PM on page 65 Rephrase To complement prescribed burning, reintroduce grazing, mowing, and haying to mimic the historical disturbance of prairie and savanna. Consider bison grazing and patch-burn cattle grazing. replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 31 2023 at 3:26PM on page 42 Somewhere in this section current NR management issues need to be introduced (these should be added where it makes sense and can be shortened, but should included in the NR section Loss of key ecological process Native plant communities of MRPR have evolved over thousands of years with ecological processes that maintain their type and condition. Many of these processes have been eliminated or altered due to relatively recent human activity. Fire historically maintained prairie and savanna as open, herbaceous-dominated habitats. Native grazers such as bison and elk provided structural diversity within habitats for plants and wildlife. For example, reconstructed prairie in the absence of bison will tend toward uniform plant height and favors a suite of certain vegetation. Bison create variable structure and species diversity, while creating habitat via trampling such as wallows. Habitat degradation The landscape surrounding the park reserve contains large populations of invasive species. This has resulted in invasive within the park. Invasive species are especially problematic and are considered target invasive species for control include common buckthorn, eastern red cedar, garlic mustard, reed canary grass, Kentucky bluegrass, smooth brome, Tatarian honeysuckle, and wild parsnip. Deer populations in North America are historically high compared to pre-European settlement due to loss of key predators and land management that generally favors deer. High deer populations can exert pressure on ground layer plant species, including shrub and tree regeneration. Negative impacts on species such as spring ephemerals of maple-basswood forest have been linked to over browsing by deer. The Trout Brook stream channel is currently in a state of ‘active channel evolution’ as the stream slowly adjusts to the altered water and sediment supply from the watershed. Both the north and south tributaries and the main stem of Trout Brook have become down cut, which has resulted in floodplain abandonment and has exacerbated bank erosion. The active channel and stream bank erosion issues observed in Trout Brook have resulted in habitat degradation in both the aquatic and riparian communities. Beavers and beaver dams (already discussed) Altered land use within the watershed and increased precipitation due to climate change has amplified the volumes of water moving through the drainage system, and has increased erosion within the ravine and Trout Brook. Ravine erosion contributes sediment deposition to Trout Brook, which disrupt the native plant communities and provide opportunities for invasive vegetation establishment. Excess Nutrients Nutrient imbalance is an issue within both terrestrial and aquatic environments. Nitrogen and/or phosphorus exist in excess amounts regionally and locally. Increased nutrient availability typically makes plant communities more susceptible to establishment of invasive species. Park Access Accessing areas of the park reserve for management activities, is a challenge due to the rugged topography, private inholdings, and surrounding private lands. Ravine bottoms are generally inaccessible by vehicle and heavy equipment and steep slopes of the many ravines make vehicle or heavy equipment access impossible. Blufftops are generally accessible, but where they are dissected by ravines, they may be cut off from vehicle and equipment access. Some blufftops and slope-shoulders, where heavy equipment could be used, are surrounded by inholdings or private lands outside of the park reserve. These inaccessibility issues limit the management tools available. replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 31 2023 at 10:29AM on page 137 This should be its own appendix. Apendix B replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 27 2023 at 10:35PM on page 1 Add executive summary Add appedix 80/20 calculation replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 27 2023 at 6:33PM on page 112 I don't think these are being explored for Miesville at this time. Best to delete the equipment rental section replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 27 2023 at 6:31PM on page 111 Use these photos as trailhead example photos in the plan chapter replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 27 2023 at 6:30PM on page 111 Use these photos as trailhead example photos in the plan chapter replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 27 2023 at 6:29PM on page 110 Consider removing 'sustainability' seems to be repeated in Park Access section replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 27 2023 at 6:23PM on page 109 Delete "as discussed in the natural resources stewarship section" replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 27 2023 at 6:22PM on page 109 Underground burial of any future power lines should be explored to mitigate visual impact to the park and river valley. replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 27 2023 at 6:22PM on page 109 Underground of any future power lines should be explored to mitigate visual impact to the park and river valley. replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 27 2023 at 6:20PM on page 109 and opportunties for septic can be explored. replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 27 2023 at 6:18PM on page 104 Remove, this is addressed in the Park Boundary section replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 27 2023 at 6:13PM on page 103 only the following fields are needed. Hide all others Description Project number External Funding Assumption Estimated County Project Cost Community Support replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 27 2023 at 6:06PM on page 94 I see there is another section for this in the next chapter but light on content.... replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 27 2023 at 5:52PM on page 100 some of these items are not overlooks - for example camping and trail intersections replies
Lillian Leatham Jul 27 2023 at 5:50PM on page 99 I'm pretty sure a portion of this loop is a maintenance road and should not be shown as an interpretive trail replies
Comments
Close