×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Thompson County Park Phase II SD Review

Please Review the Project Boards and Leave your Comments

After discussing project prioritization and pricing in January, designs displayed below are the product of several design meetings between our multi-disciplinary team of consultants and a core team of Dakota County staff, and incorporates feedback from agency and other related stakeholders. The project concepts shown were grounded in the Master Plan, but in some cases have undergone changes based on new information or recent/upcoming projects. 

Your feedback on these projects will inform the finalization of Schematic Designs, pricing requests, and upcoming community engagement. Please review and weigh in on the concepts by Wednesday the 27th at 12PM.

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Commenting is closed for this document.


Concern around the slope to get to the trailer to this location. Grounds is going to test it out this week/early next
Could this move closer to the connector trail or at least closer to each other to help with maintenance?
Would want to use our standard enclosure
Engineered wood fiber - typically comes by box truck or semi to the park and then has to somehow get back here to dump the load; and then it needs to be watered down. Concern if that will really work back
Maybe need to reframe this - not exactly nature play. Should it be called "nature-themed play" or something like that?
This is a pretty remote part of the park that will be hard to access for ongoing maintenance. Include shelter as an alternate? Christina to talk to Niki
in reply to Mark Ryan's comment
This pond is low on NR's list for restoration. Don't know that this would be a prime viewing spot
Remove this from the base. Add as an alternate.
Open style grate for bottom of bridge deck
in reply to Christina's comment
consider lighting similar to what's around the lake loop already
add lighting to this area
yes to lighting
Seeing increased graffiti in the park - are there strategies that we can employ to help decrease this on some of the new improvements? Understanding that there's maintenance on our side as well
Is there a more paired down version of the gardens that we can do? If we want to go with a phased approach for this part of the park as we figure out ongoing maintenance
Do not want this type of walkway, especially not for this long of a stretch. Maintenance is a lot more than a typical pathway
in reply to Joseph W Walton's comment
Can we get some help determining ongoing O&M costs?
in reply to Joseph W Walton's comment
Not as a community garden - keeping current planting plan, but getting the neighbors on board to help with maintenance
Not a taste prompt with signage - this would be used for programming purposes only
in reply to Steve Levens's comment
50 amp pedestals, one on each side (total of 2)
We are ok with precast or poured in place
How close is this to the water table being this close to the lake?
Is it possible to keep the trail that is here currently?
in reply to Christina's comment
Want the land bridge to look as natural as possible from the road
Suggestion
Most of my comments are akin to "don't do this", but this is a really cool concept and a good spot for design to 'go nuts' a little bit. :) When it comes time for design, it would probably be good to consult with MnDOT on whether they have experience with how to manage drainage for those rain events that overwhelm the soil/plants on the bridge (underdrains, overflows, etc.).
in reply to Christina's comment
Suggestion
Even if it is just a portion of the north wall that is reduced for viewing access from above and below, that could be placed close to the trail here.
Simplify the planting schedule - feels like we might be trying to do too much in such a small area.
Suggestion
Might be good to note in the wetland process that the option to expand the R2R bridge was more impactful, and that is another reason why this northern location was selected.
Suggestion
This sort of "surface" level work in this area is probably good - I believe this old parcel area has potential dump material or contamination, which should be considered with more substantial projects in this area.
in reply to Christina's comment
What will it look like both to pedestrians and those driving on 52
Like the overall flow of this with the curves in the trails and layout of the berms.
Suggestion
I'm not sure if there are needs for erosion protection in this ravine - I think the stormwater is piped? - but if there are issues, there'd be an opportunity to address them during construction.
What will this wall look like?
People will make their own path over towards the edge of the bridge to be able to see traffic/the view. Does it make sense to shift the trail north?
Concern around the maintenance of berms - hard to mow and get larger equipment over/on them
Suggestion
I noted on the other sheet that the "cascade" should have a stilling basin or something between it and the Emerson Pond...that may limit views of a cascade.
Suggestion
I'd suggest some sort of pool/stilling area downstream of a cascade so that there is no resuspension of pond sediment in the pond north of Emerson.
Suggestion
I'd suggest sticking with cobbles or something smaller than boulders, as boulders would likely be out of place for this topography and area. (You can use some at the crossing or the "cascade" for the appeal, but I'd suggest keeping the channel more 'natural.')
Suggestion
I implore the County to consider this approach more of a "dry creekbed" (I'd call it an 'outlet channel' but that doesn't sell) in order to set user expectations. That is, don't call it a "daylighted stream." My suspicion based on the historical aerials is that there was probably an outlet channel for Thompson but not a real "stream" with consistently flowing water. Maybe a "restored natural outlet channel" or something is a middle-ground.
Suggestion
I know added stalls is the target here, but I'd suggest rounding out the ends of this new drive lane to make turning easier for waste hauler pickup and for organics drop-off. Could use signage to direct waste users to "outer loop" for drop-off...County could also consider directing traffic flow with signs/striping to minimize drive lane width.
in reply to Dylan Strand's comment
Agree with Dylan...I don't think the County has the vacuum capabilities to maintain pervious pavement.
How many handicap spots are needed with this expansion?
in reply to Christina's comment
Do we need to add lighting to the middle of the lot?
Natural Resources team wants to help with species selection. Question: are there going to be specific things that we have to deliver on as part of the funding?
Making sure there's lighting over here too
No, stick with the standard
We don't think berms should be used. Berms are difficult to maintain. Mowing equipment has to be small. Would have to use weed whips instead of mowers. And the soil is usually not ideal, and will be difficult to grow on.
in reply to Christina's comment
portico area should have a switch that turns on flood lights for easy night time navigation
Need to make sure the portico area is well-lit - currently is not and has caused issues with things getting hit. Pedestrian-scale bollards don't always work well where cars are also present.
Patio lighting - accent lighting but also have a flood-light type option for end of night. Make sure stairs are well lit (from a maintenance perspective, don't want lights within the concrete treads)
Although the daylilies and lilacs are indicators of an old farmstead, they are still non-native plants that should be replaced by natives. And the trees should be preserved as much as possible for shade, etc.
yes